RealitySlate.com

  • Increase font size
  • Default font size
  • Decrease font size
RealitySlate.com

What do the 1920’s teach us about today?

E-mail Print PDF

We have been told that we are in the middle of the greatest economic disaster since The Great Depression.  So with that premise, perhaps we should look back at that time period, and the era before it, for insight.

This is a subject that has been written about, at some depth, for the last several years.  There are generally two narratives; the first is that the “Roaring 20’s were a time of excess, Coolidge gave a greater tax cut “to the rich,” (sound familiar?) and Hoover “did nothing” until FDR had to clean up the mess.  The Second narrative is that Harding, despite his corruption, restarted the economy, Coolidge cut taxes for everyone and the 20’s are an era to be emulated.

The first narrative is certainly in dispute.  Hoover did more than nothing.  However, most of what he did was detrimental.  One little mentioned thing that Hoover did was put in a moratorium on immigration.  When unemployment is over 20% percent, closing the borders sounds good, right?  Here is the problem; this was a time when many Europeans were fleeing the oncoming Fascist storm.  Many of them were innovators, investors, wealthy capitalists and saw the flaw in a growing State.  In 1929-1930 those people would have been pretty helpful.  Closed borders are also an exercise in a flawed zero-sum economic view, in that more people equals more mouths to feed.  Another thing that Hoover did was implement new taxes on several sectors, not to mention the 38% Marginal Tax Rate increase.  Add to those elements, large “works programs,” managed at the State level and the Smoot Tariff, a levy on nearly all imported goods.  Now “nothing” is not an adequate description for Hoover’s four years.



Add this page to your favorite Social Bookmarking websites
Reddit! Del.icio.us! Mixx! Free and Open Source Software News Google! Live! Facebook! StumbleUpon! TwitThis Joomla Free PHP
Last Updated on Saturday, 07 August 2010 12:52 Read more...
 

When Conversation Devolves To Simple Phrases

E-mail Print PDF

We have all seen the terms for years; crook, idiot,  rubes, money-grubber, tree-hugger, bleeding-heart and those are the older terms. Has anyone asked lately if phrases, often devoid of meaning, aid any cause at all. Isn’t it more likely that they simply make the other guy look bad.

All sides are guilty of the practice as a form of dismissal.  In the last few years these phrases have taken new shapes, with the same intention.  The newer phrases, with our instant gratification society, can take hold in a matter of hours.  Phrases, or terms, like



Add this page to your favorite Social Bookmarking websites
Reddit! Del.icio.us! Mixx! Free and Open Source Software News Google! Live! Facebook! StumbleUpon! TwitThis Joomla Free PHP
Read more...
 

Blame Game?

E-mail Print PDF

When a Presidential Candidate runs for office, they do so often selling themselves as having the answers to many of the countries woes.  Once that new President takes office, is it acceptable for that President to blame the last guy?

The economy is still struggling, no matter what political persuasion you are.  Sure some regions are worse than others and some industries are harder hit.  However we all feel, or see, some effects of the economic situation.  So as a President faces the onslaught of difficulties, what should we expect from our executive?



Add this page to your favorite Social Bookmarking websites
Reddit! Del.icio.us! Mixx! Free and Open Source Software News Google! Live! Facebook! StumbleUpon! TwitThis Joomla Free PHP
Last Updated on Monday, 12 July 2010 12:39 Read more...
 

The Libertarian Weltanschauung

E-mail Print PDF

As Ron Paul and other prominent politicians, of the libertarian persuasion, remain somewhat popular their ideas come out into the forefront.  So how should libertarians be seen from other persuasions?

Libertarians have economic and tax policies more like that of conservatives, while their social policies are more like that of the left.  The libertarian view on foreign policy and executive power puts them in a category of their own. 

During the Republican debates, Ron Paul



Add this page to your favorite Social Bookmarking websites
Reddit! Del.icio.us! Mixx! Free and Open Source Software News Google! Live! Facebook! StumbleUpon! TwitThis Joomla Free PHP
Read more...
 

Be Straight, to the Point and Don’t Swallow the Emotional Worm.

E-mail Print PDF

Can the Right’s opposition to the Obama Administration go off track?  Sure, especially if we try using the same purely visceral rhetoric the Left used against Bush.  Haven’t you noticed yet.  The Left is expected to be petty but when the right does the same thing, we are being divisive.

Calling the President a Socialist, Marxist, Leninist, Progressive radical or whatever other term is en vogue this week, won’t work in swaying the middle to the right.  You see the Middle has bought the fib that the Left gets petty in defense of the little guy, while the Right is just mean.  You see when the Left (let me rephrase that) as the Left continues to stew in their hatred of Bush, they are justified in doing so.



Add this page to your favorite Social Bookmarking websites
Reddit! Del.icio.us! Mixx! Free and Open Source Software News Google! Live! Facebook! StumbleUpon! TwitThis Joomla Free PHP
Last Updated on Saturday, 10 July 2010 16:35 Read more...
 


Page 2 of 11

Login or Register

Login

Don't You have account?

Sign Up

Ads on: Special HTML